Many nonprofits learned the importance of revenue diversification the hard way over the past two years. Unexpected reductions, or even elimination, of certain revenue streams had them scrambling to meet increased demand — or simply to stay afloat. So how can your organization achieve the greater financial stability that typically comes through diversification?
Perhaps the most prominent argument in favor of revenue diversification boils down to “hedging your bets.” Your organization could lose a large grant, a recession might dampen individual donations or government funding priorities could shift. But if you have other incoming revenue, it can minimize the disruptions while you look for ways to fill the gap.
Multiple revenue streams also can provide organizations with greater autonomy. If your nonprofit is overly reliant on a single funding source, it may have no choice but to accept certain constraints (for example, donor-imposed restrictions) that come with that funding. And expanding revenue streams can expand your nonprofit’s network of connections. Connecting with a community foundation or major gift donor could give you access to people and entities with similar interests and means.
If your organization determines that diversification is a good strategy (see “Watch your step” below), you have several options, including:
In the survey “Foundations Respond to Crisis: Lasting Change?” recently conducted by the Center for Effective Philanthropy (CEP), foundation leaders signaled that they plan to continue to reduce administrative burdens for grantees, such as grant application and reporting requirements. They also plan to increase unrestricted funding.
Adding one or more revenue streams isn’t an overnight process. It will take planning and preparation. You might, for example, need to establish new accounting processes and controls. In the long run, though, it can prove more than worthwhile. Just make sure you check with your tax advisor about potential UBIT issues.
For all its benefits, revenue diversification isn’t necessarily right for every nonprofit. Potential downsides exist, and each organization must assess whether the benefits outweigh the costs in their circumstances.
For example, it generally takes some time to get a new revenue stream up and running. Is your organization able to weather the associated costs without offsetting revenues? A new revenue stream also may have ongoing administrative costs that may concern some stakeholders who are sensitive to such expenses. Alternatively, keeping a lid on overall administration costs might require diverting resources from other programs or revenue streams.
Additional revenue streams could have the unwanted effect of “crowding out” private donations. Prospective donors who see that your nonprofit has landed new grants or government contracts may feel that their donations might not impact the organization and will instead donate to other groups.
This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.
Receive a digest of articles published by our thought leaders in your inbox.
Thanks for subscribing. You'll be the first to hear about new items and special offers.
Meyers Brothers Kalicka, P.C. | Privacy Policy