Blog Layout

The enemy within – How can you prevent employee fraud?

December 14, 2017

Occupational, or employee, fraud is an ongoing hazard to businesses’ bottom lines. It can take several forms, from skimming, to billing schemes, to corruption, to asset misappropriation. In 2016, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) estimated that the average business loses about 5% of its annual revenue to fraudulent actions by employees, while the median loss is a hefty $150,000. Organizations without antifraud controls suffer even greater overall losses. Further, the majority of small-business fraud victims don’t recover their losses. So it’s important for business owners and management to find ways to prevent employee fraud and reduce its impact.

How can you slash the risk?

While all organizations are at risk for fraud, companies with fewer than 100 employees tend to suffer disproportionately. Why? They’re more likely to have weaker internal controls due to factors such as a limited number of personnel and less management oversight. Clearly, by taking proactive steps, business owners and managers not only can slash the risk that their organizations will be hit by fraudulent activity, but also uncover any wrongdoing more quickly. The sooner a perpetrator is caught, the less harm he or she might cause. So, here are some ways to protect your business:

Remain vigilant. Look for common warning signs of fraudulent activity, such as an employee who’s living well beyond his or her means or a worker who refuses to take time off. While the latter might be a sign of dedication, it also can signal the individual’s concern that a replacement will discover his or her criminal activities. An employee who insists on working odd hours, when he or she is most likely to be alone, also may be trying to get away with something.

Separate duties. The more difficult it is for a single employee — acting alone — to commit a crime, the less likely it is to happen. That’s why many companies require multiple individuals to authorize disbursements over certain amounts, or assign one employee to add vendors to the payables system and another to pay them. Separating duties also makes sense when reconciling bank accounts and other statements. The employee charged with making deposits or disbursements shouldn’t also reconcile the bank accounts, as doing so creates an opportunity to hide any wrongdoing. In small companies, having the bank statement delivered unopened to the owner for his or her review is an effective way to deter unauthorized activities.

Use physical controls. Locking away checks and financial statements and allowing access only to employees who require them for their jobs not only makes it more difficult for other workers to misuse these instruments, but also sends a signal that management takes seriously the need to safeguard the company’s assets.

Train employees. Educate staff members to know what fraud is and how it can occur, as well as how it can hurt the business and ultimately their livelihoods. Armed with this information, employees will be better able to identify fraudulent actions. And, by simply discussing the issue, management emphasizes the fact that it’s on guard against potential wrongdoing.

Implement a tips hotline. Tips from employees or vendors accounted for nearly 40% of all fraud detections in the ACFE report, making it the most common detection method. It pays to establish a means for employees to securely let the appropriate manager know if they have reason to suspect fraudulent behavior.

How can you reduce potential losses?

Why simply shrug and accept employee fraud losses as an inevitable cost of doing business? You might not be able to completely eliminate fraud, but if you take these antifraud measures, you’ll greatly reduce any potential damage. Your financial advisor can help you develop the most effective employee fraud prevention plan for your business.

© 2017

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: