Blog Layout

Tax Tactics: November 2015

November 30, 2015

The Ins and Outs of Tax Breaks for Getting To and From Work

As you’re probably already aware, you generally can’t deduct costs related to commuting between home and work. The IRS considers commuting to be a nondeductible “personal expense” instead. But there are some instances when commuting costs are considered deductible “transportation” expenses. And you might be eligible for tax-advantaged transportation fringe benefit programs through your employer. Let’s take a closer look at tax breaks that are available related to getting to and from work.

Deducting the expense between work and home

IRS Revenue Ruling 99-7 allows you to deduct the expense of traveling between your home and a work location under certain circumstances. One is if you travel between your home and a temporary work location that’s outside your metropolitan area. The IRS recognizes that it would be unreasonable to expect a worker to relocate his or her principal residence for just a short-term job.

Another instance when you can deduct what might seem like a commuting expense is if you travel between your home and a temporary work location — regardless of distance — and you have one or more regular work locations away from your home. This exception might apply if, for example, you’re a consultant who sometimes travels directly from your home to a client’s worksite.

Still another instance when commuting-like costs may be deductible is if you travel between your home and a temporary or regular work location, but your home qualifies as your principal place of business. For example, perhaps you work out of your home and travel to a client’s temporary worksite, while also renting conference space away from home (a regular location).

Indefinite job assignments

A key consideration for the first two exceptions is the meaning of “temporary work location.” Notably, a job assignment of indefinite duration isn’t considered temporary.

According to IRS Revenue Ruling 99-7, absent facts and circumstances that indicate otherwise, a worksite is temporary if employment there “is realistically expected to last (and does in fact last) for one year or less.” However, if a job is initially expected to last one year or less but that expectation changes during the course of the job, it’s treated as temporary only until the date it becomes evident that the job will last more than one year.

Other transportation benefits

Qualified transportation fringe benefit programs offer tax benefits for both employers and employees. Employers that provide workers with transit passes, vanpool services or parking at or near the office or a mass-transit facility can deduct the expense while excluding the benefits from employees’ wages (subject to the limits discussed below). Or the programs can simply allow employees to pay these costs with pretax dollars.

Qualified parking benefits can be provided in the form of a noncash benefit (such as the free use of a pay parking lot) or a cash reimbursement of up to $250 per month for 2015. A cash reimbursement also can be provided for vanpool services or mass transit (or a combination of the two), but unless Congress extends transit benefit parity for 2015 (contact your tax advisor for the latest information), the limit is only $130 per month this year. These same limits apply when your employer pays these costs with pretax dollars.

You’re eligible to take advantage of both the parking and mass-transit/vanpool benefits, which would be applicable if, for instance, you had to pay to park at a commuter train station and also had to pay for the cost of taking the commuter train. If you don’t participate in either of the benefits and use your bicycle to commute, you may be eligible for a $20 monthly benefit.

Bottom line

As you know, every little bit of savings can help. So work with your tax advisor to ensure you’re taking advantage of all the transportation-related tax breaks you’re eligible for. Moreover, your advisor can help you make sure you comply with any additional rules and restrictions that might apply.

© 2015

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: