Blog Layout

Tax Tactics February 2016

February 15, 2016

Property Dividends: Handle with Care

Corporate shareholders sometimes receive distributions in the form of property rather than cash. And while there’s nothing wrong with this practice, it’s important to understand the tax implications.

Tax treatment of distributions

The tax rules surrounding corporate distributions are complicated, and a full discussion of them is beyond the scope of this article. In general, a distribution by a C corporation is treated as a dividend (and is taxable to the shareholder) to the extent of the corporation’s accumulated earnings and profits (AEP), also referred to as “E&P.” If a distribution is greater than the corporation’s E&P, the excess is treated as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the shareholder’s basis, and then as capital gain.

An S corporation is treated like a C corporation to the extent it has E&P — for example, if it was previously organized as a C corporation or if it acquired a C corporation’s assets. Otherwise, a distribution to an S corporation shareholder is treated as a nontaxable return of capital up to his or her basis.

If a corporation distributes property other than cash to a shareholder, the amount of the distribution is the property’s fair market value (FMV), less any related liabilities the shareholder assumes.

Gain property

Owners often give little thought to taking distributions of corporate property — a company car or truck, for example. But these distributions may trigger unwelcome tax consequences. Consider this example:

ABC Inc. is an S corporation with no E&P, owned equally by two shareholders, Sam and Dave. ABC gives Sam a van with an FMV of $15,000 that it purchased for $35,000. The company has depreciated the van over several years, so its adjusted basis is $5,000. Assuming Sam’s basis in the company is more than $15,000, he’s not subject to tax on the distribution. But ABC recognizes a $10,000 gain (the van’s FMV less ABC’s basis), all of which is ordinary income. Even though only Sam benefited from the distribution, the income is passed through to both shareholders ($5,000 each) and reported on their individual tax returns.

If ABC was a C corporation, the income would be reported at the corporate level (subject to potential double taxation when distributed to its shareholders). Sam would be subject to tax on the value he receives — a $15,000 dividend, to the extent of ABC’s E&P. Keep in mind that, even if the company has little or no E&P, distributing the van will generate E&P in the amount of the gain ABC recognizes.

Loss property

Suppose that, in addition to the van, ABC distributes a car worth $15,000 to Dave. The company paid $35,000 for the car, but its adjusted basis is $20,000. The company still recognizes a $10,000 gain on the van, but its $5,000 loss on the car is nondeductible. ABC would be better off selling the van and the car for $15,000 each and distributing the cash to Sam and Dave. The shareholders would receive the same value, but the company would be able to deduct the loss on the car, reducing its net gain to $5,000.

Do your homework

If you’re considering a corporate distribution of property rather than cash, be sure to analyze the tax consequences first. There may be alternatives that can reduce your tax bill.

© 2016

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: