Blog Layout

Summer 2016 Business As We See It

June 21, 2016

There are New Rules for Partnership Audits

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, signed into law in November 2015, substantially changes the way the IRS may audit partnerships and, unless they’re not treated as partnerships for tax purposes, multimember limited liability companies (LLCs). The goal of the changes is to streamline the current partnership audit process.

The IRS acknowledges that partnership audits are difficult because the process can require auditors to calculate each partner’s share of any adjustment.

The new rules generally go into effect for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, partnerships may generally be able to elect to apply the rules for tax periods starting after November 2, 2015, and before January 1, 2018.

Adjustments at the Partnership Level

In the most significant change, tax audits may be done and any resulting adjustments may be determined and collected at the partnership — rather than the partner — level. However, the law provides several ways some partnerships can opt out of this. This contrasts with most auditing procedures in place before the law passed. Under the old rules, for partnerships of up to 10 partners, the IRS generally audits individual partners.

For most partnerships of more than 10 partners, the IRS typically conducts what’s often referred to as a TEFRA (named after the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982) proceeding to resolve issues best determined at the partnership level. Adjustments flow for the year of the audit to the partners, who may have to file amended returns for the year.

For audits of Electing Large Partnerships (ELPs), which are partnerships that have at least 100 partners, adjustments generally flow through to the partners for the year in which the adjustment takes place, rather than the year under audit.

New Changes

The new rules provide a single set of procedures for most partnerships. In addition, many adjustments would be assessed in the year the audit is completed, and not for the year under review.

However, partners typically won’t be subject to joint and several liability for partnership adjustments. (Under j oint and several liability, e ach party is independently liable for the entire amount of a relevant claim.)

In addition, the law provides some exceptions. Rather than have adjustments assessed at the partnership level, a partnership can decide to issue adjusted Schedules K-1 for the reviewed year to its partners who were members of the firm during the year under audit. This could include partners who are no longer with the firm. The partnership must elect to do this no later than 45 days after the adjustment is made. The partners for the year under review would need to pay any additional tax and amend their returns for that year.

In addition, partnerships of 100 or fewer partners typically can opt out of partnership-level audits, so long as its partners are either individuals, S corporations, estates, C corporations or foreign entities that would be treated as C corporations. The partnership would need to make this election each year.

Partnership members should review their operating agreements to see what revisions they should make in light of these changes. For instance, since the new rules can bind partners to a decision made by one representative who has sole authority to act on behalf of the partnership, partnership members should define the limits of this person’s role and authority. The agreements also will need to account for the fact that, under the new rules, partners could be liable for adjustments stemming from years in which they weren’t members of the partnership.

Working It Out

The revised partnership audit rules are complex. They are expected to make it easier for the IRS to perform audits so large partnerships and multimember LLCs may be at a greater risk of being audited. Additional guidance is expected to come out on the new rules this summer. Your accounting professional can provide additional guidance on the impact of these changes.

© 2016

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: