Blog Layout

Succession Planning for Professional Services

July 23, 2012

Your Firm’s Future Depends On Its Succession Planning

Dan Taylor was the managing partner Milford Taylor & Shapiro (MTS), a professional services firm with 28 professionals, for more than a decade. He was well-liked and ran the firm profitably, maintaining high client retention rates, operational efficiency and steady growth. Because Taylor was healthy and still in his 50s, it never occurred to anyone at MTS that the firm should plan how they’d replace him.

Then a heart attack forced Taylor into early retirement. MTS’s biggest rainmaker and its niche practice group leader — neither of whom had been groomed for firmwide leadership — began a bitter battle for the managing partner role. After MTS’s executive committee chose the niche group leader, the rainmaker left, taking key clients and prospects with him. Plunging revenues, poor morale and inexperienced leadership sent the firm into a downward spiral. Three years later, MTS went belly up.

This scenario may sound extreme. But it could happen to almost any firm that hasn’t planned for leadership succession.

Excuses, excuses

To effectively begin succession planning, you might first consider the reasons your firm has put it off thus far. Has your current managing partner vowed that she’ll never retire? Are other partners reluctant to broach the subject for fear they’ll offend her? Does the pool of potential successors lack the required experience and skills? Are you worried that clients will take their business elsewhere if they learn your current leader may soon step down?

Some issues are easier to address than others. Many organizations, for example, simply haven’t found the time to make a succession plan — they’re too focused on meeting short-term goals to think about the future. If time is your firm’s problem, consider devoting your next partner retreat to succession planning.

Policies prevent conflict

Whether it’s in a weekend retreat or over an extended series of meetings, the first step in succession planning is to develop policies that will enable a gradual transfer of power. This includes establishing an age, such as 62 or 65, when the managing partner is required to begin the multiyear process of transferring power and client work to his or her successor.

Such a policy will help your firm deal with managing partners who are unwilling to retire from the position or reluctant to share “their” clients. To head off potential conflicts, specify that the partner can begin drawing retirement benefits only when your firm’s executive committee or new managing partner determines that the transition has been completed successfully. Keep in mind that such policies aren’t intended to force partners into retirement, but to get them to start the often-long transition process.

Indeed, it’s important to encourage retiring partners to remain involved — as advisors, mentors or even part-time practicing professionals with reduced client workloads. Be sure your succession plan includes details about compensation, benefits and perks, such as club memberships, for retired partners who remain active in your firm.

Grooming the next generation

Once formal transition details are worked out, create a training program for managing partner successors. Some professionals are natural leaders — capable of inspiring confidence and effecting compromise — yet on-the-job training remains essential. Professional services firms are complex organisms and keeping them running and growing takes experience and a variety of personal and intellectual skills.

Training programs typically involve a mix of structured and unstructured steps. Mentoring associates and younger partners is a good way to spot leadership talent early. You can then assign the most likely candidates to be committee heads and project managers or to oversee support staff. Also consider candidates’ professional specialties, client relationships, rainmaking abilities, financial acumen and time management skills.

Once a probable successor is identified, he or she should be included in significant management decisions and financial issues such as those related to budgeting and compensation. And as the managing partner nears retirement, the successor should get to know all major clients and take the lead in meetings with them.

Much of the successor’s education, however, is likely to be informal. Some of the most valuable advice is communicated during casual lunches or golf outings.

Make a choice

If your firm has yet to create a formal succession plan, or even begin succession planning all together, don’t put it off any longer. Leadership succession isn’t a matter of if, but when. The only question is whether the transition will be seamless and successful or fraught with conflict and risk your firm’s future.

Sidebar: Keeping clients on board

When professional services firms fail to plan for succession and power struggles ensue, everyone’s focus is likely to be on internal politics. Unfortunately, neglecting clients during periods of transition makes them more likely to take their business elsewhere. Clients may already be upset about the end of a trusted relationship with your retiring managing partner. Uncertainty about your firm’s very existence will only fuel their anxiety.

So be sure to tell major clients about your firm’s succession plan, and introduce younger partners and even promising associates to them long before the managing partner’s retirement date. Showing clients that you have a deep talent bench and procedures for putting the best leaders in place will reassure them that your firm is stable and will always be able to focus its energy on their matters.

As seen in Business West

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: