Blog Layout

Spring 2013

May 29, 2013

How to Avoid Medicare Penalties in 2013

2013 is going to be a big year for physicians with regard to reporting Medicare quality measures and participating in e-prescribing and EHR incentive programs. All three programs have been voluntary — until now. Eventually, Medicare payments to physicians will be reduced if they don’t participate in the programs. And Medicare officials will use doctors’ performance in 2013 as a benchmark for future penalties.

E-prescribing is essential

Medicare’s Electronic Prescribing Incentive Program uses a combination of incentive payments and payment adjustments to encourage e-prescribing by eligible professionals. It requires doctors to attach code G8553 to Medicare claims that use an e-prescribing system. In addition to sending prescriptions electronically, the system must be able to generate an active medication list, as well as information on formulary medications; lower cost, therapeutically equivalent drugs; and patient eligibility requirements.

Doctors who fail to sufficiently use e-prescribing will see a 2% reduction in their Medicare Part B payments in 2014. To avoid that penalty, your practice must indicate (through its claims) that it has employed e-prescribing in at least 10 patient encounters between Jan. 1, 2013, and June 30, 2013. Physicians who earned e-prescribing bonuses in 2012 are exempt from the penalty.

Demonstrating “meaningful use”

Physicians can earn up to $44,000 from Medicare or $63,750 from Medicaid (one or the other, not both) by demonstrating their adoption and meaningful use of an EHR system. Medicare eligible professionals must initiate a qualifying EHR system by Oct. 1, 2014. Doctors adopting EHR technology for the first time must operate under the first stage of meaningful use rules for two years before moving on to the second stage. The sooner a practice gets started, the better. Those who have already achieved meaningful use need not move on to the next stage until 2014.

Beginning in 2015, eligible professionals who haven’t successfully demonstrated meaningful use will be subject to a payment adjustment. The payment reduction starts at 1% and increases each year that meaningful use is not  evident, up to a maximum of 5%.

The Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) is a Medicare program that uses a combination of incentive payments and payment adjustments to promote reporting of quality information by eligible professionals. Incentive payments are made to doctors who satisfactorily report data on quality measures related to Part B services they have provided. Beginning in 2015, the program applies a payment adjustment to eligible professionals who don’t satisfactorily report data on quality measures for covered professional services.

To participate in PQRS, doctors must report information from their practices on specified individual quality measures or measures groups (based on major diseases such as diabetes and osteoporosis). There are four ways these reports can be made:

  1. To CMS on their Medicare Part B claims,
  2. To a qualified Physician Quality Reporting registry,
  3. To CMS via a qualified EHR system, or
  4. To a qualified PQRS data submission vendor.

Physicians who report quality measures satisfactorily receive a bonus of 0.5% of all their Medicare Part B charges. Those who fail to report successfully in 2013 will incur a penalty of 1.5% of their 2015 reimbursement rates. Moreover, the reduction in physician payments will grow to 2% in 2016 and subsequent years.

Practices of 100 or more physicians that fail to make PQRS reports in 2013 will receive a 1% penalty in 2015 under Medicare’s value-based payment modifier program. The program is designed to pay more to groups that provide higher-quality, lower-cost care. CMS plans to extend this program to smaller groups and solo practitioners over the next few years.

Interesting years ahead

This year and for several years to come, most physician practices will be challenged as they implement these changes. That’s why it’s critical that physicians tap into the knowledge of their legal and financial advisors closely. •

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: