Blog Layout

Retirement Plan Administration – Be Wary of the Pitfalls

October 20, 2012
As seen in the October Issue of Business West

By James T. Krupienski, CPA

 

Oct. 15 is the extended due date for filing a calendar year-end employee-benefit-plan tax return — Form 5500. This means that many of you are wrapping up your annual financial statement audit, or are working with your third-party administrator to remember your PIN and password, which is needed to electronically file your return.

 

As an auditor of these plans, I often see fiduciaries who are not fully aware of the specific provisions of their plan or the rules and regulations regarding their administration. As a result, there are many errors that can occur. Some of these errors can lead to serious consequences regarding the continuation and qualified status of the plan.

While preparing your plan’s tax filing, it’s a good idea to re-evaluate some of the process and controls involved, making adjustments and improvements where necessary.

This article is intended to highlight some of the more common errors that are found in retirement plan administration, including the timing and remittance of employee-deferral contributions, the improper application of the definitions of eligibility and compensation, the improper use and review of hardship distributions, and a general overreliance on the plan’s third-party administrator.

 

Timing of Employee Deferrals

Employee-deferral contributions are required to be remitted to the plan as soon as they can be segregated from the company’s general assets, but in no event later than the 15th business day of the month following the month they were withheld. In many instances, plan administrators will cite the 15-day rule when discussing their remittance policies. It should be noted that the 15-day rule is not a safe harbor, but rather the last day before contributions are automatically considered late.

More often than not, upon examination by the Department of Labor, examiners will look at when all other payroll taxes were remitted by the company. In addition, they will look at consistency, adherence to the established policy, if any, and past history. With technology today, most plans should be able to remit these funds within three to seven business days. Any remittances that fall outside of the established guidelines, even if only by one day, may be considered late and consequently subject to corrective procedures and excise tax reporting.

 

Eligibility and Compensation

There are many items that are defined in the plan document. Two of the most misunderstood and/or overlooked definitions are those for plan eligibility and compensation.

Misunderstanding the plan’s definition of ‘eligibility’ often leads to employees being delayed entrance to a plan when they are eligible, while other employees are allowed to enter the plan prematurely. Many administrators misinterpret the difference between when an employee meets the eligibility requirements and when the employee is allowed to enter the plan. For example, if an employee meets the eligibility requirements of a plan on June 1 but there is a quarterly entrance date, the employee may not be able to enter the plan until July 1.

If for any reason you feel that this is not being performed properly, please check with your third-party administrator or CPA, as the penalties for failing to comply with the provisions of a plan can be severe.

Compensation is another area to which plan administrators need to pay particular attention. First, not every plan uses the same definition of compensation. Second, the plan may use different definitions of compensation for different purposes, such as for deferrals and employer contributions. Most often overlooked is the treatment of bonus compensation in relation to the plan definition of ‘eligible compensation.’ For example, if the plan elects to use W-2 wages as its definition of compensation, all bonuses, whether through payroll or manual check, must be included when calculating the employee deferrals. If not, a written election from the employee must be on file.

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: