Blog Layout

The Importance Of Record Retention Policies

December 20, 2019

These days, it’s hard to imagine holding onto paper copies of every bill, invoice or financial document. Today’s society has moved from paper copies to digitized, searchable files—with the click of a mouse or stroke of a keyboard. Many of us even have copies of important documents secured by fingerprints or facial recognition on our iPhones. While methods of retaining documents have changed, having a record retention policy is an important aspect of business that should serve as a guide, no matter where or how files are kept. 

Retention of specific documents should be easily identifiable in a company record retention policy. A basic record retention policy should include a listing of recommended retention periods for specific financial items. The length of time certain records should be maintained depends on services offered by the company, types of files and any specific regulations that may determine the holding period. The retention policy should be reviewed by a company’s legal counsel to ensure proper compliance with all laws and regulations. 

Records retention generally falls into four general time-specific categories: two years, three years, seven years and permanently. Documentation to be retained for two years includes items such as bank reconciliations and general correspondence. Typical three-year retention policy items include bank statements, insurance policies, internal reports and employment applications. Records to be kept for seven years include payroll records, personnel files (for terminated employees), sales records and subsidiary ledgers. Items to be retained indefinitely include audit reports, active contracts, legal correspondence, meeting minutes of board of directors, stockholders, etc., retirement and pension records and union agreements. In addition, there are specific guidelines provided by the IRS that govern retention of income tax returns and related documents. Generally, income tax returns are kept indefinitely, along with related depreciation schedules, financial statements (audited or unaudited) and year-end trial balances. 

As the world becomes more technologically advanced, it is becoming easier for companies to store files on the “cloud.” Cloud-based storage is the newest method of storing records and files. Keeping files on the cloud not only frees up physical space, but also significantly reduces the risk of potential for loss of work and crucial documents. Companies are recommended to back up their computerized files to the cloud daily, at a minimum. 

Record retention on the cloud is a secure and paperless way to keep all required files. Many companies opt to scan in all paper copies of files, support or related documents and keep them on the cloud. This is a great way to reduce physical paperwork while remaining in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and company policies on record retention.  As e-mails have become a significant form of communication, their storage timelines have also become important. E-mails are subject to discovery as evidence in the event of a lawsuit, so ensuring that e-mails are retained for an appropriate amount of time is crucial. The storage of e-mails should be outlined in a company’s record retention policy, dependent upon the nature of the e-mails. Some may need to be kept indefinitely if they include significant legal correspondence or other agreements. Companies should refer to the general guidance for these matters.   

Companies should consider the necessary requirements for record retention based on their lines of business and areas of expertise. Companies should also consult with legal counsel to develop an appropriate record retention plan that follows all appropriate laws and regulations, including specific IRS guidance for tax-related items. In today’s digital world, it is easier than ever to engage in cloud-based storage for purposes of complying with record retention. Additionally, a record retention policy should be reviewed annually for possible changes and updates. After all, who knows when paper copies will come back into style? 

Emily White, MSA is a senior associate at Meyers Brothers Kalicka. You can reach her at  ewhite@mbkcpa.com.

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: