Blog Layout

Managing Property Tax on Your Business

March 26, 2013

Most businesses have recently finished their tax year and are closing their books and analyzing expenses. Business Part of this process is usually reviewing what expenses can be reduced in future years to add profits. 

Many times, the amount paid for personal property tax is not even considered in this process. However, effectively managing this tax can have a significant impact on the final amount assessed. This article will explain a few simple steps you can take to ensure that you’re not overpaying your company’s personal property tax.

The Form of List (FOL) is a document used by Massachusetts cities and towns to calculate the local personal property taxes of businesses. The form, which is issued early in the year, is often completed with very little regard. Unfortunately, this particular form can have significant tax consequences.

When completing the FOL, be sure to report a value for all the assets listed on your books. No asset has a zero value in the eyes of your city or town. Be mindful of this and make sure that the assets listed on your books accurately represent those assets you actually possess — there is no need to pay a tax on something you no longer own.

The majority of local assessors will assign a fair market value to the assets on your books, none of which will have a value lower than 10% of the original cost. This makes it very important to write off all of those old computers, that broken-down forklift, or even that traded-in copier still included in your fixed assets.

Another issue to keep in mind is that some local assessors require that the disposal of assets be formally communicated to them. Simply leaving those assets off the listing doesn’t ensure that they will be removed from the assessor’s file. Businesses can request a list from the assessor summarizing their assets, their cost, and their assessed value. Use this list to cross out assets that have been disposed of (or abandoned) so they are removed from your base taxable amount.

If you are a Massachusetts corporation registered with the state, you pay a tangible-property excise tax on your state income-tax return for the net book value of furniture, fixtures, and inventory.

Local assessors should assess you only a personal property-tax bill at the local mill rate on non-manufacturing machinery owned. Care should be taken to ensure that items being listed as non-manufacturing machinery (computers, copiers etc.) are not also listed under furniture or fixtures on your state tax return. This will result in a double tax.

If your business is not incorporated (a sole proprietor or partnership, for example), the city or town can tax all of your fixed assets and inventory at the local mill rate. It could be advantageous to consider the effect of this difference. Local property rates can be about $40 per thousand of fair market value versus the state rate of $2.60 per thousand of net book value.

New Requirement

This year, Massachusetts has introduced a new filing requirement. Based on this new obligation, corporations and LLCs taxed as corporations (including S corporations) must now file a “Certificate of Entity Tax Status” with the MA DOR annually. Companies who have a web-file business account with the state will now see a new tab for “Annual Certificate of Entity Tax Status,” which allows them to submit the information needed to be included on the MA DOR Annual List of Corporations for Property Tax Status, also called the Corporation Book.

This list is examined by local assessors for a few different reasons. The first reason is to determine if your business is a corporation, preventing a local tax on your inventory, furniture, and fixtures. The second reason, and perhaps the most important part of this process, is to determine whether or not you are in fact a classified manufacturer.

Classified manufacturers receive a local property-tax exemption on their machinery in addition to their inventory, furniture, and fixtures. As outlined above, the differences in the taxable amount and tax rate make this very beneficial. So how do you go about determining whether or not your business has the classified manufacturing status? If you don’t have it, how do you go about getting it?

On the Corporate List, there is a code to distinguish companies that are classified manufacturers in Massachusetts. If your company is not distinguished on the list as such, you need to file a Form 355Q with the MA DOR for status approval. There are certain qualifications that must be met in order to be considered a classified manufacturer in the Bay State.

Generally, a corporation may be classified as a manufacturing corporation for any calendar year if it is in existence and engaged in manufacturing in Massachusetts as of Jan. 1 of that year. A corporation is engaged in manufacturing if both of the following requirements are satisfied:

1.  The activities of the corporation involve manufacturing; and

2.  The manufacturing activities performed by the corporation are substantial.

Manufacturing is defined as the process of substantially transforming raw or finished materials by hand or machinery, and through human skill and knowledge, into a product possessing a new name and nature, and adapted to a new use. This is a facts-and-circumstances test emphasizing the importance of what information you provide when completing the Form 355Q.

There may be other challenges to overcome, but this is a good starting point when determining whether your company could be eligible to receive the local property-tax exemption on machinery. If you believe that your company meets any of the requirements listed above, you should be sure to discuss this with your accountant or tax advisor. Do not assume that you should receive an exemption without the state’s approval; cities and towns are aggressively working to identify businesses not qualified for the local exemption either partially as a corporation or more extensively as a classified manufacturer.

When that Form of List comes in the mail this year, be sure to pay attention and, as always, consult your tax advisor. Managing property tax on your business is important and can have a significant impact on your business.

 

Dan Eger is a tax associate for the Holyoke, MA based public accounting firm Meyers Brothers Kalicka, P.C. ; (413) 322-3555; deger@mbkcpa.com

 

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: