Blog Layout

Healthy Perspectives: Summer 2016

July 27, 2016

Can Your Practice Meet HITECH Goals?

Smart Ways to Optimize Your EHR System

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009 prompts physicians and other health care shareholders to adopt health information technology (HIT) to help improve efficiency and cut costs. Under the act, physicians even have received incentive payments for implementing Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems at various levels of “meaningful use.”

As a result, most practices have implemented some version of EHR. But whether this implementation has indeed led to more efficiency, safer patients and reduced costs is up for debate.

4 Ways to Make it Work

Here are four ways to optimize your EHR system:

  • Explore the possibilities. Many software programs, such as Microsoft Word, have multiple functions that most people never discover. Similarly, EHR systems contain functionality that no one uses. Why? If a physician and staff are happy with their workflow — or at least, accustomed to their system — chances are that implementing an EHR system will have minimal impact. This may be fine, because the system should follow the practice’s workflow.

 

But when implementing an EHR system, it’s important to take the opportunity to evaluate the practice’s workflow and decide whether there’s a better way of doing things. If so, the EHR system may help improve the practice’s operations. Vendors can help by demonstrating particular functions — but they don’t have all the answers.

  • Evaluate workflow. “We’ve always done it that way” might be your practice’s motto — but doing things the same way for a long period doesn’t always lead to success. Obviously, the EHR system should support workflow, rather than the other way around. But flaws in that very workflow might be harming efficiency and costing money.

Efficiency isn’t necessarily the only goal — higher-quality patient care or providing more time with patients should also be important. An EHR system can provide many benefits, but each practice needs to take the time to evaluate whether specific functionality could help it achieve its goals, or whether it would be better off keeping the status quo.

  • Get in sync. Most EHR systems now have full, or nearly full, functionality — meaning they also have billing and practice management features. But this doesn’t necessarily mean all modules of an EHR system are as good as what a practice may already be using.

It’s important to evaluate whether the physicians, or others in the practice, need to relearn every aspect of its workflow to use a subsystem. If the practice uses excellent billing software and the EHR’s billing subsystem isn’t as good, can the EHR system sync with the system the practice already uses — and may want to continue to use?

  • Automate. Most EHR systems contain some form of automation, macros and templates. When there’s a template, you might use it to enable physicians to spend more time with patients. Macros — especially ones already in the system — can be major timesavers after your staff becomes proficient in their use. Clicking on one item instead of five is a great way to optimize your EHR system, but not all systems work the same. It’s best for your staff to know how to optimize the system and stay current with changes and updates. Many physicians find that using voice recognition software is efficient and saves time.

Practices often have several different types of consent forms that patients need to sign. Typically, the paper forms are scanned into the EHR system, shredded or sometimes even stored. Buying several digital signature pads and creating fillable PDF versions of the consent forms can be a good strategy. Staff then upload signed forms directly into the EHR system, saving on paper, ink, wear-and-tear and time.

Time Well Spent

The HITECH Act was designed to improve health care by helping physicians become more efficient and cost effective. It’s an admirable goal, but technology often has a difficult learning curve that can undermine this objective. Taking the time to learn an EHR system’s intricacies and its potential effects on the practice’s workflow, however, can be a significant step toward hitting the HITECH Act’s goals and improving patient care in general.

Sidebar: Medicine on the Move

The practice of medicine has always been mobile — physicians rarely sit in one room and have patients come to them. Even in a small practice, physicians usually move from a private office to an exam room and then perhaps to the front desk to inquire about administrative matters. The digital world supports this with laptops, smartphones, tablets — and now, watches.

Many Electronic Health Record systems are designed to be accessed via mobile devices, though this functionality is not yet an industry standard. The biggest concern here is security and privacy — many high-profile data breaches involve a stolen or lost laptop.

Mobile devices other than laptops typically don’t store medical data, but it’s important that unauthorized individuals not be able to use the device to gain access to patient information. Therefore, it’s vital to require a secure passcode to unlock the device before use and that the device — or just the app — can be remotely deleted in the event that it’s lost or stolen.

© 2016

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: