Blog Layout

Healthy Perspectives May 2015

May 11, 2015

Dissension in the Ranks

How to Knock Out Physician Conflicts

It’s sad to say, but not all doctors in physician practices get along. Whether they’re haggling over administrative matters or a partner’s job responsibilities, the strife it creates can turn a normally congenial practice into a war zone. But there are ways to coexist peaceably.

Elect a strong leader

Many partnerships consist of one partner who leads the practice. The other physicians may have appointed this leader because the articles of incorporation require them to pick someone. Or they did so because that physician seems like the only one who has the interest or skills to run a business.

Subsequently, the leader becomes the administrator responsible for daily practice issues. The problem? He or she is left holding the bag while other partners focus on issues that affect only them — not the practice as a whole. Elect a strong leader and pay a monthly compensation for handling administrative matters.

Unfortunately, physicians often downplay the importance of leadership instead of emphasizing it. Define partners’ job responsibilities so they share authoritative duties equally. Then, make sure partners are compensated for the hard work, extra hours and positive outcomes they contribute.

Expect challenges

If a practice stagnates, it will die. One key to staying alive is establishing a practice vision — its purpose, expectations, concerns and goals. Whether starting a new venture, adding new partners or implementing strategic changes, your partners must mutually maintain this vision.

Of course there will be challenges, such as adding new services or procedures. Moreover, the practice will likely encounter certain issues if it opens up a new office or hires additional staff physicians. Such operational changes can alter your practice’s vision and create significant problems.

Because weathering these changes isn’t easy, don’t expect partners to always agree. Instead, allow each the opportunity to express his or her viewpoint. After all, rational, professional debate is healthy as long as it doesn’t deteriorate into heated arguments.

Avoid preferential treatment
Physician partners’ age differences can also cause problems. Doctors from different generations (and cultures) often disagree about how to practice, what constitutes work hours and whether senior physicians deserve preferential treatment.

For example, older partners may feel they have the right to make special requests of younger partners, such as to take on an older doctor’s night and emergency calls. Their reasoning is often because they themselves had to comply with such demands early in their careers.

But younger partners may disagree with these requests and feel they unjustly create more work for them. And they’re usually right. In a true partnership, partners’ accountability lies in direct proportion to their ownership percentage — both financially and operationally. Therefore, partnerships typically shouldn’t provide unequal perks based on seniority.

Create a compensation model

When reimbursements don’t keep pace with operating-cost increases, partners’ stress levels may rise. A need to decrease partner bonuses can add even more fuel to the fire. And if you’re trying to unify your partners, or add new ones, the financial turmoil only intensifies.

For instance, ill will can occur when one partner isn’t as involved in financial decisions as the others. Similarly, many practices struggle with partners who fail to produce results commensurate with their salaries.

To mitigate these issues, implement a clear, amenable compensation model for physician partners. At minimum, each partner must generate enough revenue, less expenses, to cover his or her salary. Also, annually set partners’ goals and review their performances and compensation.

Keep the peace

It can be traumatic when partners in a medical practice lock horns. If your practice is experiencing this scenario, you need a committee to help you work out the issues. Ask your CPA and health care advisor to step in. He or she can help you work out any issues, without pointing fingers, and return your practice to a peaceful state.

© 2015

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: