Blog Layout

Healthy Perspectives June 2015

June 26, 2015

 

Practice Notes

Exploring the Ins and Outs of Outsourcing the Billing Function

Physician practices wrestle frequently with the decision about whether to outsource their billing processes. It can be hard to balance the pros and cons. What’s good for one practice might not work for another.

So, whether you want to improve the billing practices within your practice or are looking for a vendor who can raise the output of your revenue cycle management, the answers to certain questions can lead to a better decision about outsourcing those functions.

Key questions

How does your practice billing and collection metrics compare with industry standards? Do you believe your billing and collection procedures and systems would benefit from upgrades? Have you accepted the need for more investment in your revenue cycle technology but lack the necessary capital? Do you know where to allocate your limited resources to maximize net revenue? Are your billing and collection operations keeping up with the practice’s growth?

Reimbursement models and payer requirements are evolving constantly. So be sure your revenue cycle processes and technology are up to the challenge. For example, is your practice able to keep up with changing compliance and payer policies? Have you had difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified billing and collections staff? Do staff members spend too much time trying to resolve denied claims? And last, do you have any concerns about misappropriation of funds or fraudulent billing?

If the answers to many of these questions are affirmative, consider subcontracting billing and collection functions to an outside vendor.

Third-party billing

This function should offer several flexible, value-based contracting options in which payments are tied to the practice revenue results achieved. In addition, the services it offers should be tailored to the practice’s structure and requirements. Solutions in the vendor’s package should function seamlessly with each other across the practice’s revenue cycle.

Look for a vendor that employs a full staff with experience in all phases of revenue cycle management, as well as the related technology. Its services should comply with HIPAA and support both ICD-10 and Meaningful Use in all stages. The vendor’s operations should include the ability to electronically process the submission of claims and remittances, and the use of credit cards. As an added feature, the arrangement should allow the practice access to all its billing data, up-to-date reporting and analytics competencies. Finally, through the outsourcing contract, the vendor should assume responsibility for resolving claims denials.

It’s worth the effort

Finding a billing vendor that meets these criteria will be worth the effort when it pays off in reduced costs and improved revenue cycle performance.

© 2015

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: