Blog Layout

Healthy Perspectives June 2015

June 26, 2015

Paths to Practice Success in a Value-Based Market

It’s no secret that health care reimbursement is moving from a volume-based model to a value-based paradigm. Unfortunately, this is a transformational change for which most practices aren’t prepared.

The goal of value-based care

Value-based care incorporates an array of clinical initiatives, delivery models, and provider payment methodologies involving bonuses and penalties. The goal is to align cost, quality and outcome measures. Participating successfully in these initiatives and models requires different capabilities and resource commitments.

Supporting value-based care

The recent 2014 Survey of U.S. Physicians by Deloitte Center for Health Solutions asked physicians to rank the most important work-related resources and capabilities they needed to support value-based care. The top results were:

·       Expanded clinical support capability,

·       Information technology tools,

·       Access to nonphysician staff,

·       Access to the latest medical equipment and facilities,

·       Ability to negotiate third-party payer contracts,

·       Access to more patients, and

·       Access to capital.

It’s true that physician practices don’t have control over all these elements. But, it is possible to narrow them down to a handful of critical success factors.

Success factors

Physicians need clinical and technical support to take a balanced, end-to-end approach to delivering quality care while also competing on value. This typically takes the form of care coordination, care pathways, registry access and patient engagement tools that often are available from partners, such as hospitals, health systems and health plans.

Integrated health information technology (HIT) can enable physicians to more effectively treat patients and manage risk. Using EHR data and analytics, high-risk patients can be identified and actively managed. Physicians can test which actions/interventions best improve quality, cost, and health outcomes. HIT also allows them to communicate, share, coordinate and engage seamlessly with multiple clinicians for improved care management.

In a value-based care environment, physicians benefit from enhanced business management and organizational skills that facilitate evaluating contracts, leading care coordination activities and managing partner relationships. These can be learned through formal courses and on-the-job training.

Financial and clinical risks

Transparent governance structures with trusted decision-making procedures help allocate financial and clinical risks among all parties involved. If accountability standards are set for caregivers at each stage of care, physicians will feel confident of receiving credit for their contributions. Giving physicians influence over setting performance goals may help address their concerns over fairness.

Payment models

As physicians prepare to practice more value-focused medicine, they can expect to encounter variations of four types of payment models:

1.     Shared savings arrangements where a physician is rewarded if patients have better-than-average quality/cost outcomes, and penalized if they don’t,

2.     Per-patient-per-month capitation payments covering physician-related services, or “global” capitation payments covering costs of pharmacy, hospital, and other services, as well as physician-related services,

3.     Bundled payments consisting of a single payment for all the services around a particular patient’s treatment or episode of care — paid to a physician, physician group, or hospital for redistribution to individual clinicians, and

4.     Fee-for-service payments combined with a monthly care coordination fee.

The bottom line

Work with your advisors to take a balanced, end-to-end approach to delivering quality care while also competing on value.

© 2015

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: