Blog Layout

March 2015

March 16, 2015

Digging Through Employment Law Issues

Every physician group is subject to numerous federal and state employment laws. Several issues have become the focus of recent enforcement activities against health care employers, but there are ways physician practices can protect themselves.

Wage and hour issues

The number of complaints filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act has been rising steadily — up nearly 5% in 2014 over 2013, according to the Federal Judicial Caseload Statistics for the period ending March 31. Class action lawsuits that involve several employees are common.

Many of the cases against health care employers challenge the use of “auto-deduct” time keeping systems. This is the practice of automatically deducting time from employees’ pay for a meal period even though they didn’t take the break or they had to work during that time.

Auto-deduct policies are not per se illegal, but they may have to be modified to comply with the latest court rulings. For example, if you’ve adopted such an auto-deduct policy, make sure the override procedure isn’t complex, employees are trained on how to override the deduction, and managers don’t prevent employees from exercising the override option.

Leave of absence policies

Employees eligible for the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) are entitled to 12 weeks of job-protected leave. After the 12 weeks are up, the employee might qualify for additional leave as reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has sued employers, including many in health care, to challenge policies that require automatic termination of employees who are unable to return to work after a fixed period of leave (such as six months). Normally, indefinite leaves aren’t required by the ADA, but no-fault termination policies that don’t allow for any leave extension invite a challenge from the EEOC.

To help reduce your risk of losing a lawsuit, avoid automatic terminations under leave of absence policies and consider reasonable accommodation in extended leave situations. It’s also important to give appropriate training to managers.

Pregnancy discrimination

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits an employer from discriminating against a woman because of her pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth. The act doesn’t expressly require “reasonable accommodation,” under the ADA, of a woman’s disability resulting from pregnancy.

In July 2014, however, the EEOC issued guidance that requires accommodation of a pregnant woman even if she isn’t disabled. Specifically, the EEOC guidance states that an employer may not confine light duty to those suffering from workplace injuries, but must provide light duty to pregnant employees who need it as well. The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling resolving this matter in the first half of 2015.

Criminal records

The EEOC has also pursued litigation against employers who reject applicants because of their criminal records. The EEOC cited that hiring policies that include blanket exclusions of people with criminal records have a disparate racial impact, and therefore violate the Civil Rights Act.

To prevail against such claims, the employer must show that its policy is job-related and consistent with business necessity. The employer can accomplish this by identifying specific offenses related to applicants’ suitability for a particular job, deciding how recent a conviction must be to disqualify a candidate, and individually assessing each applicant. Those applicants should be given the opportunity to correct errors or explain any mitigating circumstances.

Getting to the nitty-gritty

As employers, physician practices face many legal risks. Here we’ve touched on only some of the federal employment law issues. There are many other federal laws to consider, not to mention state laws. An employment law attorney can help you sort through the various issues to ensure your practice abides by federal and state employment laws.

© 2014

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: