Blog Layout

Carried Interest and Capital Gains Reporting

February 5, 2021
by Teresa Judycki, CPA

 

Teresa Judycki, CPA | MBK


Often a start-up venture may look to incentivize compensation for professionals to assist with cash flow.  Other businesses affected by COVID may similarly look to reduce base compensation in favor of a bonus structure.  One way to accomplish these goals is to grant the service provider a profits interest in the business.  Before accepting or implementing such a compensation structure, you should be familiar with recent law changes that may affect you.


The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed taxation of “carried interest,” and Treasury released final regulations providing rules and guidance in January 2021. “Carried interest” is a term that was frequently used to refer to a Wall Street tax break that let fund managers pay a lower tax rate on much of their income instead of the rate paid by wage-earners.  You may be surprised that changes made by Congress in this area could affect you.


Carried interest is generally a profits interest in a partnership granted in exchange for performance of services. A service provider might be granted a profits interest in a fund as incentive in addition to his or her fixed fee. Under prior law, any long-term capital gain (“LTCG”) generated by this profits interest was taxed at preferential capital gain rates (20% plus 3.8% net investment income tax vs. the top individual rate of 37% generally applicable to wages). Some define a loophole as a tax benefit to which he or she is not entitled. Taxing compensation at preferential rates was perceived by Congress to be a loophole and the topic of discussion and proposals for years until the 2017 TCJA made changes to the law.

 

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the new law increases the holding period required for preferential tax rates from greater than one year to greater than three years for capital gains associated with carried interests. Gain on assets held for three years or less is taxed as short-term capital gain. 

 

The law applies to gain derived from an applicable partnership interest (“API”), which generally includes any profits interest in a partnership held in connection with the taxpayer's substantial services in an applicable trade or business (“ATB”). An ATB involves raising and returning capital and investing or developing securities, commodities, real estate, and/or certain other assets (for example, a portfolio asset management business). An API does not include any interest in a partnership directly or indirectly held by a C corporation. There are special rules for transfers of any API to a related person. 

 

There is a presumption that any services performed are substantial services. Once a partnership interest falls under these rules, it retains that character until an exception applies, even if the holder retires. The API may be held directly or indirectly—for example in a tiered structure.

 

The net LTCG affected can be gain or loss allocated to the owner by all APIs or gain or loss on disposition of APIs. There is a limited “look-through” rule for dispositions at a gain where the holding period is more than three years.

 

There are five exceptions to treatment of a profits interest as an API. 

 

The first exception is an interest held by a person who is employed by another entity that is conducting a trade or business (other than an ATB) and provides services only to such entity. 

 

The second exception is for interests held by a corporation. The regulations limit this exception, in general, to C corporations.

 

The rules do not apply to income or gain attributable to any asset not held for portfolio investment on behalf of third-party investors (sometimes known as the family office exception).

 

An API will not be an API in the hands of a bona fide purchaser who does not provide services in the ATB, is unrelated to any service provider, and who acquires the interest for fair market value.

 

The exception causing the greatest interest and discussion is the capital interest exception. The final regulations made taxpayer-friendly changes to the proposed rules. An API does not include a capital interest which provides a right to share in partnership capital commensurate with the amount of capital contributed or the value of the interest subject to tax upon receipt or vesting of the interest. An allocation meets the capital interest exception if the allocation to the holder with respect to the capital interest is calculated in a similar manner to the allocations with respect to capital interests held by similarly situated unrelated non-service partners who have made significant aggregate capital contributions (5 percent or more of the aggregate capital account balance of the partnership at the time the allocations are made). 

 

Generally, an allocation is not a capital interest allocation if it is attributable to a loan made or guaranteed by another partner, the partnership, or a related person. There is an exception for loans made by another partner if the service provider is personally liable for repayment of the loan.

 

The regulations require both API holders and the pass-through entities that have issued an API to provide information to IRS. For owners, the regulations state that the owner must file “such information” as IRS may require “in forms, instructions, or other guidance as is necessary for the Commissioner to determine that the Owner Taxpayer has properly complied...” We are still waiting for that guidance. There is similar language for the disclosure by passthrough entities.

 

The IRS, Treasury, Final Rule is 107 pages. This is only a brief overview of the rules that apply currently. The Biden Administration may bring more changes in this area. As always, if these rules apply to you, please consult your tax advisor. 


This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: