By: Lisa White, CPA is a Manager at the Holyoke based accounting firm, Meyers Brothers Kalicka, P.C.
Malik Javed, CCSP, is a Principal at KBKG and oversees engineering operations for Cost Segregation projects from KBKG’s Northeast practice.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act, H.R. 748) was signed into law. The Act has provided taxpayers with much-needed relief during this pandemic by establishing additional funding sources, such as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), by creating new tax credits, such as the Employee Retention Credit, and by significantly changing several existing tax provisions. When reviewing what relief is available, taxpayers should consider all possible opportunities including cost segregation studies which help identify misclassified Qualified Improvement Property , by reviewing current and prior year capital expenditures for retirements, dispositions, or repair deductions, and by considering accounting method changes necessary to take full advantage of the new provisions in the tax law. Two key changes to existing tax law within the CARES Act that provide cash flow for taxpayers include changes to the cost recovery period for Qualified Improvement Property (QIP) and changes to the application and recognition of Net Operating Losses (NOLs).
Qualified Improvement Property (QIP) is defined as any improvement made by the taxpayer to an interior portion of a commercial building as long as the improvement is placed into service after the building was first placed into service by any taxpayer. Additionally, QIP specifically excludes expenditures for (1) the enlargement of a building, (2) elevators or escalators, or (3) the internal structural framework of a building.
Prior to the CARES Act, a drafting error in the tax law required QIP placed in service after December 31, 2017 to use a 39-year tax life, making it ineligible for bonus depreciation. The CARES Act retroactively changed the recovery period for QIP to 15 years, thus making it eligible for bonus depreciation through 2026 (100% through 2022).
Taxpayers that want to take advantage of deducting the cost of improvements to real estate must segregate between interior and exterior improvements, as well as identify items excluded from QIP. Since budgets and design plans should be reviewed to identify these items, cost segregation engineers can be engaged to assist with this analysis. Tenant improvements often include items that are not eligible for QIP treatment. For example, HVAC costs in a retail shopping center might include both ductwork inside the building that is eligible for QIP and package units on the roof that are not eligible. Other examples include certain storefronts and interior seismic retrofits. When evaluating QIP, taxpayers should not assume all tenant improvements automatically qualify. Although QIP is now eligible for 100% bonus depreciation for Federal income taxes, many states do not conform to bonus deprecation and require a 39-year tax life. For higher taxed states, cost segregation can still make sense when interior improvements are significant.
Taxpayers who elected out of the business interest expense limitation under 163(j) are required to use a 20-year ADS life for QIP and are not eligible for bonus depreciation. In these cases, a cost segregation study is greatly beneficial because the items segregated into personal property categories do not get ADS treatment and are therefore eligible for bonus depreciation.

There is also an additional interplay with the business interest expense limitation provision. Part of the calculation to determine the amount of limited business interest expense for a given year includes determining the Adjusted Taxable Income (ATI). This calculation favorably considers tax depreciation, but only for one more year. For tax years beginning after 2021, the deduction for depreciation, amortization, or depletion are not taken into account in calculating ATI. Thus, any bonus depreciation recognized on assets identified through a cost segregation study will incrementally increase the ATI.
Prior to the CARES Act, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and other legislation severely constrained the ability to use net operating losses to lower tax liabilities. TCJA restricted carrybacks of NOLs generated in tax years after December 31, 2017 and limited carryforwards to 80% of taxable income.
The CARES Act made two significant changes to NOLs that provides cash flow for businesses
This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.
Receive a digest of articles published by our thought leaders in your inbox.
Thanks for subscribing. You'll be the first to hear about new items and special offers.
Meyers Brothers Kalicka, P.C. | Privacy Policy