Blog Layout

Business As We See It May 2015

May 4, 2015

Are You Classifying Your Employees Correctly?

How can you tell if you’re correctly classifying employees as exempt or hourly? Exempt employees, unlike their nonexempt hourly counterparts, aren’t subject to the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). However, exempt positions must meet certain requirements set by the Department of Labor (DOL).

This area of regulation gives rise to a number of misperceptions, such as the idea that job titles determine whether jobs are exempt from overtime or minimum wage laws. Breaking through the confusion and getting this responsibility right is critical, because incorrect employee classifications can expose your company to significant fines, legal action and negative publicity.

Some background

The FLSA requires most employees in the United States to be paid at least the federal minimum wage for all hours they work, plus overtime pay for hours worked over 40 in a workweek. The FLSA provides exemptions from these requirements for employees in some executive, administrative, professional, outside sales and computer positions. These often are referred to as “exempt” positions. To be considered exempt, however, the positions must meet a number of criteria.

For instance, an executive exemption requires that an employee’s primary duty consist of managing an enterprise or one of its recognized departments or subdivisions. He or she must regularly direct the work of at least two other full-time equivalent employees.

An exempt executive also must have the authority to either hire or fire employees, or have his or her recommendations regarding hiring, firing and promoting other employees be given particular weight. Finally, he or she must make at least $455 per week on a salary basis. Of special note, paying an exempt executive on an hourly basis instead of a salary basis voids the exemption, creating significant exposure.

Exempt administrative positions also need to meet certain criteria. For example, in addition to being paid at least $455 per week on a salary or fee basis, the DOL states that, to be exempt, administrative employees must be able to “exercise discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance.…”

The DOL breaks professional employees into two categories — learned and creative — for the purpose of determining whether they’re exempt. Learned professionals’ work is predominantly intellectual in character and requires a consistent exercise of discretion and judgment. Creative professional employees’ primary work requires “invention, imagination, originality or talent.” Like administrative employees, professional employees must be paid at least $455 per week on a salary or fee basis.

Additional requirements

Several other requirements come into play with exempt employees. Barring a few exceptions, exempt employees must receive their full pay for any weeks in which they’ve performed work, no matter how many hours or days they work.

If exempt employees are ready, willing and able to work, they can’t have their pay cut just because no work is available. Employers who improperly deduct pay from exempt employees’ salaries risk losing these employees’ exempt status.

Positions matter

Exemptions aren’t allowed with a number of positions, including manual laborers and nonmanagement employees in production, maintenance, technical, construction and similar occupations. These workers are covered by the minimum wage and overtime pay provisions of the FLSA, no matter how highly paid they are.

The FLSA also requires employers to maintain certain records for their nonexempt employees. These must include the hours they work daily and within a workweek, as well as the rate or basis of pay and terms of compensation.

Do good by your employees

Determining which jobs are exempt and which aren’t can get complicated, as such decisions often turn on specific job duties. Moreover, the burden of proving that a position is exempt rests with employers. So make sure you review the FLSA’s requirements and the DOL rules, along with any state or local employment laws and regulations. Also be sure to consult a legal or HR professional when determining employees’ classifications.

© 2014

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: