Blog Layout

Are your board members independent?

November 14, 2017

Nonprofits must state on their IRS Forms 990 the number of independent voting members on their board of directors. Donors, state attorneys general and the media increasingly have been scrutinizing this reporting, believing that independent directors are a key ingredient of good governance.

Some organizations mistakenly think that independence is only about addressing conflicts of interest. But the concept of independence in the nonprofit context is broader than that.

IRS definition

For purposes of reporting the independence of board members on Form 990, your nonprofit must use the IRS’s four-part definition. Under it, a board member generally is independent if he or she meets these criteria:

  1. The member wasn’t compensated as an officer or other employee of the organization or a related organization.
  2. The member didn’t receive total compensation exceeding $10,000 from the organization and related organizations as an independent contractor during the tax year. This excludes reasonable compensation for services provided as a board member.
  3. Neither the member nor any family member was involved in a transaction with the organization that must be reported on Schedule L, “Transactions with Interested Persons.”
  4. Neither the member nor any family member was involved in a transaction with a taxable or tax-exempt related organization that must be reported on that organization’s Schedule L.

You also must disclose on Form 990 whether any of your current officers, directors, trustees or key employees had a family or business relationship with each other at any time during the tax year.

Reasonable effort

Nonprofits aren’t required to engage in more than a “reasonable effort” to obtain the necessary information for the disclosures about independent directors’ family and business relationships. For example, you could distribute an annual questionnaire to all of your officers, directors, trustees and key employees asking for the relevant information.

Note, too, that a board member isn’t considered to lack independence merely because he or she is a donor to the organization. In addition, a board member can be independent even if he or she receives financial benefits as a member of the group it serves (for example, a member of a chamber of commerce who also serves on its board). A religious exception may apply if the board member has taken a vow of poverty and belongs to a religious order that receives sponsorship or payments from the organization or a related organization that don’t qualify as taxable income to him or her.

And remember, you aren’t required to have only independent board members. But some charity watchdog groups suggest that a substantial majority (meaning at least two-thirds) should be independent.

Roles for your independent directors

Independent directors are a greater testament to your organization’s integrity when they take on specific roles that can benefit from their independence. For example, the audit and compensation committees should include only independent directors. This helps assure compliance with IRS guidelines for conflicts of interest and establishing executive compensation.

It’s also a good idea to include independent directors on the governance and nominating committees and in any other board decisions where relationships could be viewed as preferential — for example, decisions related to employee salaries. And consider holding all executive sessions of your board meetings with only the independent directors.

Matter of best practices

Appointing independent directors to your board isn’t just a matter of appearance — it’s a critical component of good governance. IRS requirements aside, your nonprofit should regularly assess whether any of its directors’ financial or familial relationships affect their abilities to act in your organization’s best interests.

© 2017

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: