Blog Layout

October 2015 Business As We See It

August 18, 2015

Are You Uncertain About Uncertain Tax Positions?

Even if you’ve never had to worry about reporting Uncertain Tax Positions (UTPs) on your company’s tax return, that may change. Starting with the 2014 tax year, corporations that have assets of at least $10 million and meet other filing requirements — such as filing audited financial statements or including UTPs in others’ audited statements — must file Schedule UTP (Form 1120), “Uncertain Tax Position Statement.” That’s a shift, as the UTP reporting rules were limited to companies with assets of at least $50 million for the 2012 and 2013 tax years.

The expanding scope of UTP reporting is significant. According to some tax experts, filing this schedule may increase the chance that your company will be audited.

A little background

Although it may seem counterintuitive, some companies take positions on their tax returns that they’re not sure will be upheld. Perhaps the guidance available is ambiguous or it’s unclear if the tax regulations apply to the business’s specific situation. For example, a company may claim a research tax credit, yet not be completely confident that their rationale for taking the credit will hold up. Indeed, research credits have accounted for the largest percentage of UTPs reported, according to IRS statistics.

Some definitions can also help in understanding uncertain tax positions. The IRS defines a UTP as a position taken on a tax return for which the corporation or a related party has recorded a reserve in its audited financial statements. A UTP also refers to instances in which a company hasn’t recorded a reserve for the position because it expects to litigate it. And a “tax position” is a position taken on a return that, if not sustained, would lead to an adjustment either in a line item on the return, or a schedule or form attached to it.

While the IRS began requiring organizations to report UTPs in 2010, the framework was laid in 2006. That’s when the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Prior to this, businesses had different ways of accounting for uncertain tax positions in their financial reports. That could result in inconsistencies between statements.

Asking corporations to identify their UTPs is intended to cut the time that the IRS requires to review returns. That can help both the agency and taxpayers.

How to address reporting

As of their 2014 returns, corporations must file Form UTP if they meet several criteria — for example, if the corporation files Form 1120 or one of its offshoots; has assets of at least $10 million; issues audited financial statements or is included in others’ audited statements; and has one or more tax positions that must be reported. The reporting requirements apply whether the audited statements are prepared based on GAAP, IFRS, other country-specific accounting standards or a modified version of one of these. Form UTP is attached to the company’s income tax return.

Businesses must include a “concise description” of their UTPs on Schedule UTP. The IRS has issued guidance as to what it will — and won’t — consider a concise description. A statement such as “this is a research credit issue” typically won’t cut it. The IRS has provided an example of an acceptable description: “The taxpayer incurred support department costs that were allocated to various research projects based on a methodology the taxpayer considers reasonable. The issue is whether the taxpayer’s method of allocating costs is acceptable by the IRS.”

Businesses don’t need to report the amount of the tax adjustments that could apply if the IRS prevails in any dispute about their positions. However, they do need to rank the positions, based on the size of the reserve recorded for it. Companies must identify as “major tax positions” those that account for at least 10% of all the tax positions in their financial statements.

Confused? Work with a pro

The regulations around UTPs are complicated. So, work with your tax advisor. They can provide additional information and guidance.

Sidebar: When you don’t need a Schedule UTP

No Schedule UTP is needed if the company didn’t establish reserves on its financial statements either because the amount would be immaterial, or its tax positions were “sufficiently certain,” so no reserves were required. Similarly, companies typically aren’t required to report tax positions from prior years if they reported them on previous Schedules UTP. This doesn’t apply, however, if a transaction results in the company taking tax positions on multiple returns.

Companies that prefer to avoid the entire issue of uncertain tax positions should consider several options that could help them gain certainty regarding any tax questions. One is a private letter ruling. This is a statement issued by the IRS for a fee in response to a taxpayer’s request for clarification. Essentially, the letter interprets and applies tax laws to the taxpayer’s situation. It can be used when a taxpayer wants confirmation with the IRS that a prospective transaction won’t result in a tax violation.

The Pre-filing Agreements Program offers taxpayers a way to ask the IRS to consider an issue before they file their tax returns. The intent is to resolve potential disputes earlier, rather than later.

© 2015

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: