Blog Layout

All About the AMT – Alternative Minimum Tax

March 1, 2012

By Sean Wandrei, CPA – As seen in the February 2012 issue of Business West

Created in 1969, the alternative minimum tax, or AMT, was the result of a public outcry to congress that the rich and wealthy were not paying their fair share of taxes. Based on testimony by the secretary of the Treasurer, 155 individuals with an adjusted gross income above $200,000 didn’t pay any tax on their 1967 income-tax returns.

Accordingly, the AMT was designed as a safeguard to keep those individuals from slipping through tax loopholes. The AMT is a tax system that is calculated in parallel with an individual or corporation’s ‘regular’ tax. The higher of the two tax calculations is the one that must be paid. We will focus on AMT as it applies to the individual.

How the AMT Is Calculated

To calculate the AMT, all ‘preference’ items are added back to regular taxable income to arrive at AMT income. Then an AMT exemption is deducted from the AMT income to determine the AMT taxable income.

Preference items include state and local income taxes, sales and property taxes, accelerated depreciation, deductible medical expenses, miscellaneous itemized deductions, certain tax-exempt income, certain credits, incentive stock options, personal exemptions, and the standard deduction. These preference add-backs are items that many families who own their homes in high-income-tax states use as deductions on their regular income-tax return.

Why You May Have to Pay It

Based on the above information, there are certain taxpayers who are more likely to pay the AMT.

Large families fall into the AMT because they must add back all of their exemptions for AMT purposes. A family with a filing status of married filing jointly with four children, for example, get six personal exemptions for regular tax purposes. These six exemptions must be added back to calculate the AMT.

State and local taxes paid are also taken into consideration when determining whether the taxpayer is subject to the AMT. State and local income taxes paid are a deduction for regular tax and must be added back to calculate the AMT. The add-back includes not only state income tax, but also property taxes and excise taxes paid. From 2004 through 2007, residents of California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York paid the most ATM. These are all high-income-tax states.

What Does This Mean to You?

As it stands now, the exemption for 2011, for a married couple, is $74,450 (other filing statuses have different exemption amounts). The exemption is scheduled to revert back to the 2000 exemption amount of $45,000 for a married couple in 2012. That is 40% less than what it was. If this happens, then the amount of income that can be shielded from the AMT will be less, and more people will be pulled into the AMT. That would amount to an estimated 25 million additional taxpayers paying AMT.

The good news (if there is such a thing with taxes) is that Congress usually extends the increased AMT exemption amount. Congress tends to postpone dealing with difficult issues until it has to. So we may not know until the end of 2012 if there is going to be a patch that spares the additional 25 million taxpayers from the AMT in 2012.

How Can You Avoid the AMT?

It is difficult to plan to avoid the AMT because the regular and AMT tax systems run parallel with each other, leaving you to pay the greater of the two. Sometimes reducing one tax could increase the other tax. The best advice would be to look at your overall tax picture and start from there. You will need to know what items could cause you to be caught in the AMT and the relationship between your regular tax and the AMT. From there, you can implement a strategy that is right for you. You should review your plan if anything changes in your life or with the tax law.

One item that a taxpayer can control based on timing is the payment of estimated state income-tax payments and real-estate taxes. Since taxes paid are preference items and are added back to calculate the AMT, it may not be best to prepay those taxes prior to the end of a particular year. If you are subject to the AMT in that year, you won’t receive a tax benefit from paying early (say, in December). However, if you wait until after year end, you may have the opportunity to deduct your tax payment in the following year.

On the opposite side, if in one year you have a significant item of income resulting in a large state tax amount due with your return the following April, you will likely be subject to AMT in the year of payment since the tax will be disproportionately large compared to your income. Therefore, prepaying may be advised. Again, planning and understanding your own situation are key to determining what the best course of action is.

As always, it is best to plan and then plan some more to help reduce your overall tax bill. Calling your tax professional is a good way to start, and avoid paying more taxes than you should.

 

Sean Wandrei is a tax manager with Meyers Brothers Kalicka, P.C. His technical concentrations are in multistate taxation as well as real-estate entities; (413) 536-8510.

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: