Blog Layout

Are You Making the Most of Your 401(K) Plan?

July 15, 2022

If your employer offers a 401(k) plan, you probably know that one of the best ways to save for retirement is to max out your contributions each year. In 2022, for example, you can defer up to $20,500 in pretax salary to a 401(k) plan ($27,000 if you’re 50 or older). And if your employer offers matching contributions, you probably also understand the benefits of contributing at least enough to qualify for the maximum employer match. If you don’t, you’re leaving free money on the table.


What you may not know is that the timing of your contributions can have an impact on your eligibility for matching contributions. For example, if you “front-load” contributions — that is, max them out early in the year rather than spread them evenly over the entire year — you risk losing a significant amount of matching contributions, depending on the terms of your plan.

Front-loading advantage

If your plan allows it, front-loading can be a smart investment strategy because the markets generally appreciate in value over time. So, the earlier you contribute to a retirement plan, the more time those funds are in the market, thus creating the possibility of greater returns in the long run. 


Of course, when it comes to investing there are no guarantees, and there are times when the markets go down. If you max out your 401(k) contributions by the end of April and the market crashes in June, you may discover that your returns for that year are lower than if you’d spread your contributions over the year.


Despite this risk, people who front-load their contributions tend to enjoy greater long-term returns. But front-loading can backfire — in dramatic fashion — if your employer matches contributions based on your compensation each pay period rather than your annual salary.

Maximizing matching contributions

The employer match is a powerful tool for boosting the returns on your 401(k) account. But the method of determining matching contributions can vary significantly from plan to plan. A common approach is to match contributions up to a certain percentage of your compensation for each pay period. 


Under this approach, front-loading contributions may cause you to miss out on a substantial amount of free money. Here’s an example:

Michelle’s salary is $240,000 per year, paid over 24 pay periods ($10,000 per pay period). She front-loads her 401(k) contributions, deferring 20% of her salary, or $2,000 per pay period. Her employer offers dollar-for-dollar matching contributions, up to 5% of income — in this case, $500 — in each pay period. 


In 2022, Michelle reaches the $20,500 contribution limit by her 11th paycheck in the middle of June, with matching contributions totaling $5,500. Because Michelle has maxed out her contributions, she stops making contributions in mid-June, and receives no matching contributions for the rest of the year.


Suppose, instead, that Michelle deferred 9% of her salary ($900 per pay period) to the 401(k) plan. In that case, she wouldn’t reach the contribution limit until her 23rd paycheck in mid-December, and would receive $11,500 (23 x $500) in matching contributions. That’s an additional $6,000 in pretax contributions each year, plus tax-deferred earnings on those amounts. That can give your retirement nest egg a significant boost over 10 or 20 years. In most cases, these additional savings will eclipse the benefits of front-loading contributions.

Know your plan

To make the most of your 401(k) contributions, be sure to understand your plan’s terms. If matching contributions are determined for each pay period, then front-loading will likely cost you money. But if your plan allows you to receive a match based on your contributions for the year, then front-loading may provide an advantage.

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Katrina Arona February 19, 2025
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) which took effect on January 1, 2024 required "reporting companies" in the United States to disclose information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). In May 2024, a lawsuit was filed claiming that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution in passing the CTA. Background: December 3, 2024 in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court (Eastern District of Texas/Sherman Division) issued a preliminary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). December 23, 2024 the Nationwide Injunction is lifted and filing deadlines are reinstated. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury (FinCEN) may again enforce the CTA. FinCEN has not extended any filing deadlines. Therefore, all reporting companies should file immediately any beneficial ownership information reports (BOIRs) that were already due, and reporting companies formed prior to 2024 should file their BOIRs by January 13, 2025 (extended from January 1, 2025). December 27, 2024 the federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a nationwide injuction halting enforcement of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements, reversing an order the same court issued earlier this week. FinCEN issued an updated alert on its BOI information page , saying that companies can voluntarily submit BOI reports. February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves. Current Status: February 18, 2025 A federal court lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction stopping BOI reporting requirements. FinCEN which enforces BOI requirements under the CTA said it would extend filing deadline for initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI reports to March 21. However, reporting companies that were previously given a deadline later than March 21 may file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. Resources for consideration: March 21 BOI reporting deadline set; further delay possible BOI Injunction Lifted FinCEN BOI Center
By Katrina Arona February 12, 2025
February 7, 2025 FinCEN will consider changes to the BOI reporting requirements if a court grants the government's request for a stay of a nationwide injunction in a Texas case, according to a motion filed Wednesday, February 5th. If the stay is granted, FinCEN will extend BOI filing deadlines for 30 days, the government said in its filing in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/25). BOI reporting is currently voluntary, pending further legal developments. Businesses and stakeholders should stay alert for additional updates as the situation evolves
By Katrina Arona February 10, 2025
Some nonprofit executives try to control as much as they can. But micromanagement isn’t conducive to creating an effective team.
Show More
Share by: